The Martian movie with Matt Damon who plays Mark Watney is entertaining, but is not an Oscar contender. The movie is based on a novel, The Martian, by Andy Weir. I am not sure if the writers of the screenplay changed the novel, but they had a lot to work with, a good looking healthy man with a comedic flare alone on Mars, but failed to deliver the sorts of meaningful human experience that should have encompassed this movie in order to put this one on the map. Rather than mark the movie as uniquely its own, the film made allusions or paid homage to a previous space movie, Apollo 13 in which one of the main actors, Jeff Daniels also made a previous appearance in that film.
Showing posts with label Adventure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adventure. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Review: Film: The Martian, by Julie Renee Phelan
Labels:
2015,
Adventure,
Chastain,
Damon,
Drama,
English,
Film,
Goddard,
Movie,
Review,
Science Fiction,
Scott,
The Martian,
Thumps of 4,
Wiig
Review: Film: Zorba the Greek, by Julie Renee Phelan
“Zorba the Greek” film is based on a novel written by Nikos Kazantzakis. It is the 1964 winner of Academy Awards for Best Cinematography by Walter Lassally, Supporting Actress, played by Lila Kedrova, and Art Direction and Set Decoration. “Zorba the Greek” was also nominated for Best Picture, Actor, Anthony Quinn, Director and adapted screenplay by Michael Cacoyannis.
Walter Lassally, who was the Cinematographer for the film now lives near Chania in Crete, where he shot Zorba the Greek in 1963. Walter Lassally’s Oscar is shown in Tavern Christiana in Stavros, Greece. The name of the village Stavros, which means cross in Greek may as well act as a metaphor for the growth and transformation of the character Basil. Stavros beach is a famous location because Quinn's character, Zorba and Basil, dance the Sirtaki.
Basil, a timid English writer, played by Alan Bates, inherits a mine on Crete. Basil is half-English and half Greek, but was born and raised in England. Basil is book smart, and life dumb. When Basil hires an eccentric stranger, Zorba, to work in his mine, he finds himself drawn into a world fare more exciting and dangerous than any he has ever known. Zorba courts too many women, endures catastrophic perils in the mine that scares off other workers, and defies a group of village men seeking vengeance on a beautiful young window for thwarting their sexual advances.
Eventually, Zorba’s undying exuberance to create more and more chaos leaves Basil in a vulnerable position. Thanks to Zorba, in order to survive Basil undergoes a personality transformation into a more active participant in life. The mine on Crete … who cares about the mine … embrace the transformation of Basil and a life fulfilling story of living life to its fullest.
This film is swelling with inspiration from the story writing, acting, direction, and artful picturesque cinematography. Before you travel to Greece, watch this film. This film is a passionate introspective inspirational vision of transformation of personalities due to adverse situations and friendship. This film is a case study regarding life’s adventures and the reason each life is so precious and wonderful. Similar to a piece of art, life in the end is not always, what is important in the beginning. This film brings that message to the sand, and every now and again, we may all learn a new dance, perhaps the Sirtaki.
Labels:
1964,
Adventure,
Bates,
Drama,
Film,
Kakaoglannis,
Kakogiannis,
Kazantzakis,
Movie,
Phelan,
Quinn,
Review,
Thumps of 4.5,
Zorba the Greek
Review: Film: Everest, by Julie Renee Phelan
The movie released, Everest is in 3D, and provides some unique cinematography that ordinarily we would never be able to see in our lifetime. For that purpose, the movie is an important viewing experience. It is partially filmed in Nepal, making some of the shots memorable, but unfortunately they only had permission for two weeks of filming at that location.
The film is about the human disaster that occurred on Mount Everest in 1996 due to an all too familiar storyline of humans thinking that they are more omnipotent than nature, nature took them for a ride of their lives, and most of them failed to survive. The movie unfortunately delivers the story without the emotional impact that it should have had, an error in the editing and writing rooms. The performances by Jason Clarke, Josh Brolin, John Hawkes, Robin Wright, Michael Kelly, Sam Worthington, Keira Knightley, Emily Watson, and Jake Gyllenhaal were solid, but there was too much film time spent on certain events, and not enough time spent on other events. There were gaps in the writing, coupled with a lack of writing imagination for what was really going on in the minds of those characters on left on the mountains overnight. There are some moments that are moving, but the overall experience was not as memorable as it should have been.
Monday, January 25, 2016
Review: Film: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Julie Renee Phelan
“The Hitchhiker’s
Guide to the Galaxy” is a film based on a novel written by Douglas Adams in
1979. Fortunately, Douglas Adams started, but after his death in 2001, Garth
Jennings and Karey Kirkpatrick collaborated in completing the screenplay for
the film released in 2005. This film is in honor of Douglas Adams. The film is
a combination of “Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride” and “Laugh-In” to make a memorable and
enlightening science fiction comedy.
Although the movie is
highly entertaining, recommended reading of the book “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to
the Galaxy,” a mere two hundred pages of easy reading, prior to viewing the
film is suggested in order to familiarize yourself with the characters.
Familiarization with the characters will be beneficial for your viewing because
the movie pace is quick and bizarre. It may be hard to digest unless the viewer
has been previously disposed to such an outlandish plot and characters.
However, the plot of the film adaptation of Hitchhiker's Guide differs from the
book. The romantic triangle between Arthur, Zaphod, and Trillian is more
prominent in the film; and visits to Vogsphere, the home world of the Vogons in
the book, were already abandoned, and Viltvodle VI is inserted. Both the film
and book ends with the characters en route to the Restaurant at the End of the
Universe, the sequel.
The film begins with
a narrative that the dolphins, the second most-intelligent creatures on earth,
has attempted to warn mankind about the planet's impending destruction, but
humans had interpreted the dolphins' communications as tricks. The dolphins
considered their mission a failure and left the planet, leaving their message
as "So long, and thanks for all the fish."
The film follows an
earthling Arthur Dent, played by Martin Freeman. His best friend, an alien from
Betelgeuse who is editing the Guide, Ford Prefect, played by Mos Def. Ford
explains to Arthur in a pub that in ten minutes the earth will be demolished.
They hitch a ride on a Vogon ship. As punishment, they must listen to Vogon
poetry. They are thrown out of the air lock, and picked up by the starship
“Heart of Gold.” On board the starship, there is Ford’s “semi-half brother,
Zaphod Beeblebrox, played by Sam Rockwell. Zaphod is the President of the
galaxy who swiped the starship. Accompanying Zahod is an earthwomen Tricia
McMillan, played by Zooey Deschanel. There is an unforgettable performance by
Marvin the Paranoid Android, voiced by Alan Rickman, and played by Warwick
Davis. Zaphod must visit Humma Kavula, played by John Malkovich, his opponent
in the election. Zaphod’s campaign is described as "slanderous 'don't vote
for stupid' campaign.”
The movie appears to
be a reenactment of a European trip on $10 per day in 1993 each spaceship
representing a different youth hostel. The towel is an important necessity both
in the movie and at youth hostel for there are none, and everyone needs a
towel. The intergalactic excursions represent traversing the countries.
Traversing the continent and knowing what the foreigners are saying is a
harrowing experience. However, the most important thing to keep in mind, Don’t
Panic!
Labels:
2005,
Adams,
Adventure,
Bey,
Comedy,
English,
Film,
Freeman,
Jennings,
Movie,
Phelan,
Rockwell,
Science Fiction,
THe Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy,
Thumps of 4
Review: Film: The Good Dinosaur, by Julie Renee Phelan
The
film, The Good Dinosaur, a tearjerker, is a partial animation coupled with real
images by Pixar. The film appeared to be rushed to release for this holiday season. The
animation with real images is nothing to write about. The
story takes place about 65 million years ago—the dinosaurs are
personified;
they speak and behave similar to humans, while the human like character
behaves like a dog. It is an interesting exercise in humility, and
understanding
that there are different points of view. The viewpoint was similar to
the
Planet of the Apes, but I was a bit confused as to the purpose of the
transposition. From what I was able to gather, it is a story
about overcoming fears and coping with natural loses, while still making
your
mark.
I
thought the message was positive, but for the younger audience, the
message was
lost in the movies length. The movie is one hour, and forty minutes. The
children as children often do during a lengthy
sitting became restless. I believe Pixar should have tested the film on
an audience
composed of children rather than releasing a film that takes an adult
mind that
can pay attention long enough to follow. There were a great many scenes
that could have easily been deleted, which would have kept the
continuity, and left the children in the audience with some
understanding of the story. Review: Film: The Revenant, by Julie Renee Phelan
The film, The Revenant is not as sweeping as its predecessor that it obviously tries to emulate, which is Lawrence of Arabia, nor is it a sweeping rendition of the second waltz by Dmitri Shostakovich. It maybe a fledgling attempt by the Director, Alejandro Gonzálex Iñárritu to pay homage to a character, Sir Lawrence of Arabia, played by Peter O’Toole that had few ties to the character Hugh Glass, played by Leonardo DiCaprio. Although they both wander through the vast wilderness, be it hills of sand or mountains of snow, the two stories are not the same; while in the former film, Sir Lawrence was already a unique individual that continues to be, much to the amazement of the other characters and the audience. In the case of the latter film, Hugh Glass has an ordinary desire for revenge because his son is unjustly murdered, and learns through the process of comradeship that vengeance is best left up to the creator. I however cannot help but wonder as I am watching where paying homage stops and copying starts. I left the movie knowing the characters are different; they both did however take an epic journey, but my gut instinct tells me the direction and cinematography are too similar to Sir Lawrence of Arabia.
I believe in order to be considered for an Oscar the director must do something new; provide an additional insight into the art of film-making which I feel that Alejandro Gonzálex Iñárritu or his film just did not do. In this manner, this production does not deserve the honor by the Academy of Best Director or Best Picture. Although Leonardo DiCaprio has given us many fine movie performances in other movies, I sincerely hope this is not the film that finally provides him with an Oscar for Best Actor. I believe DiCaprio deserves to be granted with an Oscar from a truly magnificent movie.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





